Navy Aviator Officer Panel

In an Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) panel held on Nov. 30 and led by retired Rear Adm. James A. Robb, President, National Training and Simulation Association, senior naval aviation officers described the urgency to bring more effectively trained aviators to the fleet faster.


The panelists included Vice Adm. Kenneth Whitesell, USN Commander, Naval Air Forces/Commander, Naval Air Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet; Rear Adm. Richard T. Brophy, USN Chief of Naval Air Training; Rear Adm. Andrew Loiselle, USN Director, Air Warfare Division, N98, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations; Rear Adm. Max McCoy, USN Commander, Naval Aviation Warfighting Development Center; Rear Adm. Joseph B Hornbuckle, USN Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers, Naval Air Systems Command; and Rear Adm. Keith A. Hash, USN Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division/ Assistant Commander for Test and Evaluation, Naval Air Systems Command.


“We have got to deliver warfighting capability faster to the fleet than we are doing right now, said McCoy. “We need to do this while we concurrently deliver capability, work on tactics, and identify gaps.”


As sailors face an unexpected future, the U.S. Navy aims to ensure they can outthink and outfight any adversary while remaining the best trained and educated naval force.


“Training for us is not only changing the way that we train, it’s changing the way that we learn,” said Hornbuckle.


The Navy is doing this by identifying deficiencies and gaps in training and augmenting the training at those sticking points.


“We are deconstructing the conveyor belt to get more people on and through at a faster rate,” said Brophy. “We’ve got the technology that identifies the strengths and weaknesses the trainees have and where they can become better.”


Brophy further explained that while the average time to fly solo in an airplane is 13 flights, with the right training, two people in the last month flew solo on their fourth flight. And, Brophy said, “they are more technically competent.”


“As we’ve matured the efforts and the outcomes,” said Whitesell, “we’ve had some pretty successful wins over the last two years. The airwing of the future is where we are going.”


Loiselle agrees and said there has to be a focus on increasing the range space – even if that increase is not in the physical world.


“As we talk about the airwing of the future, we are moving out to platforms and weapons with ranges that exceed the range space anywhere in the U.S.,” Loiselle said. “So we need to devise a system where a significant portion of the training will occur in simulators.”


“It’s about capacity,” said McCoy. “There aren’t enough ranges and enough time. The blend of LVC is critical to make sure everyone gets the training they need to be ready for deployment.”


One critical key to increasing training efficiency and proficiency is industry.


“We are looking for ways to partner with industry to mature the technology at the warfighter training centers,” said Hash. “Schedule is king, and we have to keep ourselves accountable. It’s not just doing what we were supposed to do, it’s doing what we said we were going to do.”


“We know what the pacing threat is doing in the Pacific,” said Whitesell. “The urgency and the scheduling is key. We need these things delivered on time.”


People who read this article also found these articles interesting :